Join Tom's newsletter for news on upcoming books and stories.

Archive for the ‘Spirituality’ Category

The Power of Shame

Last weekend at Norwescon, I went to a panel discussion on “Finding Diverse Voices in SF&F.” Afterwards, while discussing the topic with someone, overwhelming shame swept over me when I recalled a childhood experience. I’m still unpacking the meaning, and felt it worth sharing.

But first, to grasp what I wish to convey I must provide some context, so don’t get ahead of me.

As a child, I didn’t have a connection with my father (the reasons are irrelevant) so my relationship with my paternal grandparents was deeply significant, since Grandpa and Grandma filled a gaping hole in my life.  Decades later, I still recall childhood summers and spring breaks, going fishing and camping with them, trailing alongside my grandfather while he took me on his rounds at the mill where he worked as a security guard, and canning tomatoes with my grandmother in the kitchen.  Also significant to me was that my grandparents were Native American.

Neither were full-blooded, but both had been eligible to sign onto their tribal rolls and chose not to, for reasons which were too complex for a young boy to understand. Grandma came from Arkansas and had Choctaw roots, while Grandpa was from Oklahoma with a Cherokee background.

Though they were not proud of that heritage (another whole topic), neither did they hide it.  My grandparents’ heritage was profoundly significant to me and so it was that, around age 10, I found myself at a ceremony honoring Native Americans.

I can’t recall exactly what brought me to this gathering of hundreds of kids; just that I was still in elementary school, so it likely was a school field trip.  In any case, the leader called for all kids who were Native American or had any Native American ancestry to step forward to the center of the ringed assemblage.  I proudly thought of my grandparents as I joined the group in the middle.

That moment was shattered when the leader walked over, hauled me to my feet and declared with a loud voice, “You are too white.  You’re lying, you don’t have any Native American.  Go back and sit down.”

My soul was branded with shame while hundreds of people watched me return to my seat, crying.  The lesson I carried from the circle was that I had no right to my grandparents’ heritage.  From that moment, it was something forbidden, destined to remain outside of my unworthy grasp—a part of my grandparents that could never be a part of me.

My mind accepted this decree, but my spirit said otherwise.  I was drawn to read whatever I found about Native Americans, and my soul was deeply moved when I read “Ishi: Last of His Tribe,” and “Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee” broke my heart with outrage.  Though I couldn’t explain why, I always felt like an alien in my own culture.

Over the years, I often felt a spiritual presence; that the Spirit of my grandparents’ Native American heritage watched over me and visited on occasion through vivid dreams and visions.  One example was years ago, at a business party during a conference in Arizona.

The host arranged for a Navajo dancer to provide entertainment, but for me it was much more.  As those around me drank and talked, I watched entranced while he performed an elaborate ritual involving concentric rings, which dropped one by one until he let the remaining one fall at the end.

Afterward, I mustered my courage while he packed.  My profound shame protested that I had no right to inquire, but I felt compelled to approach the man.  “I sensed something very deep behind your dance, but I’m not sure exactly what.  Can you share with me what it was?” I asked.

The dancer paused and looked at me with surprise for a few moments, then responded, “The various rings represent aspects of the Great Spirit; the sky, the wind, the earth and sun, plants and animals, and mankind.  Together everything makes up the web of life, but every time one falls, the web weakens, until finally the whole web collapses.  We do this dance hoping that people will see and understand.”

Then he looked at the oblivious people partying around us, and wistfully added, “But no one ever sees it.”  I responded, tears in my eyes, “Don’t give up, brother.  Someday, some of them will.”  In that instant, I felt a sense of kinship.

And so, the other night when I was talking in the corridor, the vivid experience of shame I felt as a child in that circle again washed through me, as if I was there once more—so visceral that it was everything I could do to hold back the tears.  Without realizing it, I had carried this pain my whole life.  In fact, I now see that the middle third of The Archivist is largely an auto-biographical metaphor of my inner struggle.

As the power of that shame dissipates, I now yearn to explore my Native American heritage.  I can’t say where that journey will take me, but I will no longer deny that which is a part of both my physical and spiritual DNA.  No, I did not grow up on a reservation nor suffer the degrading experiences that many Native Americans have endured—that has been their path, which I respect and I know what I am not.  But, finally, it is time for me to explore what I am.

Our society excels at telling people what they can, and can not, be.  I have known numerous gay and transsexual friends over the years, who have struggled with their identity.  They, too, walk their own path but I grasp more deeply their conflict, when your spirit tells you that you are something, which society says you can not be.

Long ago I learned not to let others define who I am.  What I learned the other night was that, just as importantly, I can not let others define who I am not.

Fiscal Obesity

It is a rare thing to see a paradigm shift take place on a world scale, such as the fall of the Berlin Wall. But I think that is what we are starting to see with Pope Francis as he exerts leadership over the Catholic Church. I’m certainly no expert on the Vatican, but like so many others around the world, I can’t help seeing what he is doing.

From the outset he made dramatic statements through his personal example as he declined lavish papal quarters and settled into a humble apartment. And he has adopted a similar lifestyle. But what strikes me the most are things that he says in this Apostolic Exhortation, such as:

Just as the commandment “Thou shalt not kill” sets a clear limit in order to safeguard the value of human life, today we also have to say “thou shalt not” to an economy of exclusion and inequality. Such an economy kills.

and

The worship of the ancient golden calf (cf. Ex 32:1-35) has returned in a new and ruthless guise in the idolatry of money

I’ve seen online comments in response, that range from “he’s a communist” to “let’s see the church give everything away” and everything in between. There is something about human nature that makes us want to see things as one extreme or the other, but the reality is that for a complex system to remain in equilibrium, there must be a constant dynamic balance. In other words, beyond a certain point, by taking an inordinate amount of wealth, the super rich end up damaging the “body” of the economic system (including themselves). It’s a systemic imbalance that is far more complex than any one person.

More than that, though, it really isn’t about economics or even politics, but rather the core mindset that global societies have taken on. And I think he is spot on. Analogies work because in real life, there are consistent patterns that hold true across disparate settings and situations. So by way of analogy, it’s not a stretch to say that consumption of wealth is quite similar to consumption of food.

Just as those sitting at a feast can choose how much to eat, those at the top who take in most of the wealth DO have a choice of how much to take. Just how much of a bonus is enough, and how much becomes just too much? Consumption, beyond what one needs, leads to obesity. So at what point does fiscal gluttony lead to what I call Fiscal Obesity?

I hope, as I introduce this term, that more of us start asking ourselves that question.

The Correct Point Of View

My post today concerns writing, but applies to life in general as well.

Recently, an online question came up in one of the writing groups I’m involved with regarding what point of view (POV) was correct for a work of fiction.  I won’t go into an explanation of POV other than to say that the basic choices are first person (I wrote that), second person (you wrote that) and third person (she wrote that).  There are numerous variations of these basic choices and there are great websites that go into more detail on this than most people want to know.  In any case, the discussion revolved around some of those variations.

I made the point that rather than worrying about the popular trend, for me it’s more a matter of being true to yourself as a writer, and being honest with yourself as an artist.

There are very explicit rules for what a writer can and can’t do within certain genre, such as in romance and they do need to be followed. That said, you could follow a formulaic approach and write something that fits very comfortably within the herd, and you can probably manage to be successful (witness Eragon) even with mediocre writing.

However, I think it’s really important to be true to yourself and to the story. The POV is only one factor (albeit a very significant one) that makes up the complete personality of the work, so listen to the heartbeat of your story, how it wants to tell itself, and if you are really connecting with it you will know how to tell it…because that’s what we really are, are storytellers.

And if you try to tell your story in some way that isn’t “real” it’s going to come across as flat as a B-grade actor on the big screen. Because to really imbue your work with life, it has to flow from the deepest, most honest part of inside of you…and believe me, you can’t fake that effortless flow of genuinely honest writing. That’s something I’ve struggled with for a long time myself, my own personal Moby Dick.  And I am still hunting that great white whale but I’m seeing it come within harpoon range now.

My point with all this was that (and this is just my opinion)…worry about the quality of the prose, worry about the honesty and emotion of the writing, but don’t worry about the POV…if you are REALLY out in left field, you’ll know it if you’re honest with yourself and the story.

So how does this apply to life in general?  Whether it is work, our family life or the pursuits we fill our lives with outside of those things, we all have passions that we pursue.  And I think it’s important to be true and honest to those passions within yourself.  Some of the most miserable times of my life were when I was less than honest about what was inside myself.

So be true to what is inside yourself, and above all else, don’t stop pursuing your great white whale.

What Science Can Teach Religion About Faith

Today I came across this Scientific American article on a Tennessee law that just passed, allowing teachers in public schools to challenge scientific findings and theories. The article specifically addressed climate science, but the bill also covers evolution and cloning, topics which are a ‘third rail’ in public discussion these days. The implication of a teacher challenging a scientific subject is that one could refuse to teach it, or possibly even teach an alternative viewpoint, i.e. creationism. It wasn’t clear from the article just how far a teacher could go, and it may be that those boundaries have yet to be tested.

I have to question whether a teacher whose notion of challenging science is to discard it, is qualified to teach science. Because science is inherently based on the process of challenging anything and everything. Even the most basic foundation of a science is always open to challenge, if one dares to joust with it. That is why Einstein was able to put forward a theory that didn’t fit with a Newtonian theory that had stood for hundreds of years. If one wishes to challenge any scientific study or finding, the arena (of academic journals) is always open, provided your game is good enough to get you into that arena (kind of like trying to break into publishing). And like any game, there are rules, which science calls the scientific method.

Which leads to what science can teach religion about faith. Many religious adherents that I know view science as weak because with few exceptions, even the most solid constructs are called theories and open to challenge. But what they don’t understand is that scientists have a faith of their own, every bit as strong as the most passionate believer, in the scientific method. That is why even the most fundamental scientific truths are less than absolute, and that is also why science continues to advance by leaps and bounds. Because scientists are willing to examine their beliefs and modify them when confronted with inconsistencies.

As a Christian, I have spent a lot of time and effort examining my belief system, and I won’t pretend to have all the answers but the one thing I’m confident of is that no one else does either. That doesn’t mean I abandon my belief system or that I doubt God exists. It just means our understanding isn’t quite right yet. To me, faith is having the courage to acknowledge that you are probably wrong in some of your conclusions, and that you might need to revise some of those conclusions.

And that is what I think science can teach religion about faith: that it’s okay to be wrong.  Because reality doesn’t change, but our understanding of it certainly can.

 

NorWesCon Session – “The Importance Of Abby”

This last weekend I went to the NorWesCon Sci Fi convention in the Seattle area, and attended a great workshop entitled The Importance Of Abby.  The session included Bridget Landry who addressed the stereotypes of women in the media, particularly strong, intelligent scientific women, i.e. geeky women.  Her point is that when women are (rarely) portrayed in the media in scientific roles, they are typically unfeminine, very serious and often unapproachable.  I haven’t done a research paper on this but I suspect there is a lot of truth to her assertion.

Then, along comes a character like Abby Sciuto from NCIS who breaks that mold. The panel discussion suggested that we as writers need to show more female characters who are top-notch scientists that are totally professional, and yet not constrained in their femininity. And while guys are often intimidated by such women, not all are and so we need to show that men can find such women damn attractive. Finally, to make it real and personal it’s also important to show the struggles that a character like this goes through, and how they overcome.

Ms. Landry gave me a lot to think about here, both in the characters that I’ve written in the past and the ones still gestating in that creative soup somewhere inside. I’ve certainly created some strong female protagonists but none that are scientific. Maybe because that story just hadn’t come to me yet, but also maybe because I wore the same blinders as everyone else. But as I think about it, I do have a WIP (work in progress) that I want to come back to, which NEEDS just such a character…I knew Hana was lacking something vital, and this is just what she needed.

On another level though, I think The Importance Of Abby goes beyond just female stereotypes. On a very deep level our society wears countless stereotype straitjackets. Can a Christian be a scientist (the subject of another post)?  Can someone support liberal causes and still be patriotic?  Every day I encounter people who are so locked into their own mindsets, that they lock others into being their enemies when they really aren’t.

So the real importance of Abby is in helping us remember that we are infinitely complex beings who can’t be mashed into any mold, even though it comforts many to try and do so.